The Ugly Duckling


I don't think most people know what the story really says.

Hans Christian Andersen is just messed up. Any actual story that I've read by Hans Christian Andersen (like the original story of "The Ugly Duckling") is just wrong. There was something wrong with the man. Everybody in his worlds is just horrible, horrible people (or animals in this case), except for the main character who's the best ever, and there's no middle ground. We're all saints or devils.

So most people know the general outline of the story of the ugly duckling. A duckling is born, it's super ugly, and it turns out it's a swan. This adaptation is probably fairly accurate to the original (except as wordy as this adaptation is, Hans Christian Andersen is a quite a bit wordier). The last five or so pages of the long book are where he finds out he's a swan. The rest of is just this poor cygnet going through horrific trials. It takes five pages for him to get born in the first place, and everybody mocks him, going so far as to bite and kick him, basically beating him up until he runs away. Then he's made fun of by a bunch of ducks. Some ganders come, and they get killed by hunters. The cygnet almost gets taken away by their dog, but he ends up in a farmhouse with a woman who's got a chicken and a cat. But he doesn't lay any eggs, so they make fun of him because he's not useful. Then he runs away again, and it's wintertime and he almost freezes to death, and gets taken in by a farmer and then escapes... An actual sentence from the book: "It would be too sad to tell of the loneliness and misery the duckling had to endure that long, hard winter as he sat out in the swamp among the reeds." As opposed to the horrible company of any other character in this book? Apparently the rest of the depressing book wasn't considered "too sad."

When he sees some swans early in the book, it says, "A flock of birds came out of the bushes. They were dazzling white, with long, limber necks. The duckling had never seen anything so beautiful.... He did not know their names or where they were flying to, but he loved them more than he had ever loved anyone before." When they return in the spring, he says, "I will fly over to those royal birds, and they will beat me because I, who am so ugly, dare to come near them. Still, it is better to be killed by them than to be bitten by the ducks, pecked at by the chickens, kicked by the girl who takes care of the duck yard, and suffer the hardships of winter!" And then he goes over to them and literally says, "Kill me!" before he discovers that he's a swan. And then all kinds of people come by and go, "Oh there's a new swan in the swan pond, oh my god!" And the last sentence is, "He fluffed his feathers, lifted his slender neck, and from his heart there came a cry of total joy and contentment."

I really wish there was a story this famous that was not this blatantly about appearances. You can say it's a product of its time, but never once does it say that the characters who are mistreating the ugly duckling are wrong. The way that it has come into our popular consciousness does not include physically abusing ugly people.

The message is not, "It's okay to be ugly." The message is not, "Treat everybody kindly regardless of their looks." No, the message is, "Things which look ugly now will turn out to be pretty later." That's the best you can get out of this. I think people assume the story says something about true beauty being on the inside, but that's not in this book.

Who gets to decide what's beautiful? Because I would imagine that swans find cygnets beautiful. It's just that he's in the wrong company for his beauty to be recognized. Why do humans even think swans are pretty, and why does the ugly duckling give a fig whether humans think he's pretty?

It's clearly supposed to be a metaphor for something, but I'm not 100% sure what. I don't think I've ever really understood the moral of (or interest in) in the pop-culture version of the story.

There needs to be a version of this story where people stand up for the ugly duckling, or he stands up for himself, before he becomes a swan. Or he doesn't turn into a swan and he's just actually an ugly duck, and it's okay. It's okay to be ugly. I'm not saying that I'm like the most attractive person in the universe, but I'm fairly symmetrical. But there are children who are not pretty. There are children with physical disfigurements and their lives are more difficult because of that. For anybody with a physical disfigurement, their life is more difficult because they are not conventionally attractive. And this book does nothing for that. You kind of expect it to, but the story just ends up uglier than any duckling could ever be.


Being pretty is more important than anything else in the world.

Publication Year
Age Range
Number of Pages
Number of words on a typical page

Naomi Horiuchi (not verified)

3 years 7 months ago

Thank you for this - it was really comforting having just watched a virtual read-aloud of (yet another) version of this book with my 3 year old, to find that someone else has noticed how bad of a story this is for kids. In the version read, there was only “saying mean things” not physical harm, and I get the feeling the author thought that made the story more appropriate but I completely disagree. The message is the same! “You may be ugly, but don’t worry there’s a chance it’s a misunderstanding and you’re actually considered beautiful, and if that’s true you’ll be happy! And people will love you!” Ugh. Just terrible. This story should be done away with or completely redone, plot-wise. Thanks for your review.

Rachel (not verified)

3 years 6 months ago

I don't know if you are American but this somehow sounds like a superficial American interpretation of a European classic. "Superficial" because you state that appearance is what this story is about, well it's not. I think what you didn't get is this: this story is a metaphor for being an outsider and different from everyone around you. It's about not being able to fit in, no matter how hard you try to change yourself to fit others' expectations. If you are trapped in wrong surroundings with people who just won't get you and will never understand you, it will feel like hell. But there comes a time when you need to accept yourself and once you do and once you are around the right people, a transformation takes place. Why doesn't anyone stand up for the duckling? Because unfortunately that is how life is for a lot of people, which is sad and children should be aware of this. It's not like there are only a few children in the world who have been bullied while others just just stood by and watched. This story is also autobiographical, I suggest you read up on it. Have a great day

I'm not sure what that has to do with it, but I am American.

I think this is the first time I've been accused of NOT reading enough into a book, instead of reading too much into it. But, seriously, it's right there in the title. "Ugly" is how he is described, and "ugly" is how he feels. I do like your interpretation, but I think it's an uncommon interpretation of the book. Maybe it's more common in Europe, but in America an "ugly duckling" refers to someone who is ugly but grows up to be pretty (or someone who is talentless but turns out to be talented, according to Oxford languages, but neither fits your interpretation).

What annoys me is he gray an ugly but then he turns into a white pretty swan . Mmm